Red meat and processed meat are not good for health? Research says that may not be the case.

Red meat and processed meat have been reported to be harmless to health, the U.S. newspaper reported Thursday. But now the bad news is coming. A new analysis of data tracked by nearly 30,000 people found that eating two servings of processed meat or unprocessed red meat a week could lead to a small but serious risk of death.

Red meat and processed meat are not good for health? Research says that may not be the case.

Infographic

The researchers said eating processed meat, unprocessed red meat or poultry twice a week had a similar risk of cardiovascular disease. The study also found that eating fish was not a risk.

And just months before the new findings came, a controversial analysis said there was no need to reduce red and processed meat intake for health.

“Everyone thinks it’s okay to eat red meat, but I don’t think it’s scientific,” Allen, an associate professor in the Department of Preventive Medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and one of the study’s authors, said in a statement. “

“The difference is small, but it’s worth trying to reduce the use of red and processed meats, such as Italian spicy sausages, Bologna sausages and cooked meats,” he added. He added that previous studies have shown that such foods are linked to conditions such as cancer.

The new study, published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Finds that people who consume two red and processed meats a week have a 3 to 7 percent higher risk of cardiovascular disease and premature death. On the individual, the ratio doesn’t look high, but if it’s on the population as a whole, it’s obviously not a small number.

“Personally, the impact is minimal,” Kuller, a professor of nutrition and food scienceatis at the University of Reading in the UK, said in a statement. But as a whole, since about 1 million people are diagnosed with heart disease each year, even a small reduction in red meat can have considerable effects and reduce the number of cases. “

The findings of the new study are so different from reports in the fall of 2019 that red meat is edible, perhaps because of a different perspective, said McConway, a retired professor at the Open University, a distance education centre in the UK.

“How could the conclusions of the two large-scale studies be so different?” mr. McConway said in a statement. It’s not because the statistics are different. The starting point for the new study is public health, noting that people can actually choose to eat less meat, and that if they eat less meat, and if there is a real causal relationship between eating less meat and eating meat and disease risk, fewer people will have heart disease and stroke. “

Neither Mr. Kuller nor Mr. McConway was reportedto involved in the study.

In addition, the study found that people who ate two servings of poultry a week had a 4 percent higher risk of cardiovascular disease. But since the study did not ask whether the chicken was peeled, fried or wrapped in breadcrumbs, the researchers said the findings were not recommended for any recommendations on poultry intake levels.

However, the researchers stressed that fried foods, including chicken and fish, should be avoided because fried producetrans fatty acids, which are directly linked to chronic diseases.

What is the conclusion of this study? Anyone who fears they are at risk of heart disease, cancer or other diseases should limit their intake of red and processed meat, said study lead author Victor Chung, an associate professor of nutritional scienceate at Cornell University, in a statement.