Motorola Solutions won a $764.6 million lawsuit. Its lawsuit against rival Heinemer for stealing key trade secrets from two-way wireless technology has been upheld by a federal jury in Chicago. Heinea said it would appeal. The jury awarded Motorola $345.8 million in compensatory damages and $418.8 million in punitive damages — the full amount claimed by Motorola, Bloomberg reported.
After a three-month trial, the jury made the decision after two and a half hours of deliberation. Motorola’s lawyers said they would seek a ban on Theonta wireless phones being sold in the U.S. to end the company’s further use of its trade secrets and copyrighted source code.
The case is the latest in a son-in-charge of U.S. companies accusing Chinese companies of poaching employees and exploiting stolen technology to develop new products. U.S. officials say its overall goal is to help China transform itself from a world factory to an economic superpower.
Greg Brown, Motorola’s chief executive, said in a statement that the ruling was “a huge victory for Motorola Solutions” and that “Heineha is only profiting from the hard work and innovation of our world-class engineers”.
Heinonda denies stealing the technology and says it has developed wireless phones.
“Hynonda was disappointed by Haitra’s verdict on the jury. A spokesman for Heinonda said, “Hytra respects the jury’s opinion and is currently considering seeking all appeal options.” “
A day earlier, U.S. prosecutors in New York accused Huawei, another Chinese company, of blackmailing the telecommunications giant for decades for trying to steal U.S. technology to build its own business.
At the heart of Motorola’s battle with Henoneist is digital wireless technology for wireless intercoms, which are critical to utility workers, construction workers and faculty, who need to stay in touch in times of crisis. The jury found that Heinonda had infringed Motorola’s copyright by stealing Motorola’s trade secrets.
Motorola said it had spent decades developing the next generation of two-way communications technology, but soon after U.S. regulators ordered a shift to digital technology, Heinonda launched a similar product.
The Chicago-based company claims that Heinenda’s strengths come from hiring Motorola’s engineers and obtaining thousands of motorola patent documents.
Hainonda, a former dealer of Motorola Wireless Phones, acknowledged that hiring engineers was a mistake, but said he developed the wireless phone. The company accused Motorola of using litigation, patents and market forces to crowd out competitors. The antitrust case against Motorola is awaiting a ruling by another judge in Chicago.
Motorola said the stolen secrets included hands-free communications, location features, emergency alerts for people in distress, and methods to connect phone users to a group of wireless phone users.